July 2005
  MBB’S MILE STONES SINCE OUR LAST NEWSLETTER
The Prime Minister  Honourable Mr. John Howard, Member  for Bennelong, together with more than 300 guests joined with us to celebrate our 80 years of legal founding. Clients  who have been with our firm for more than 50 years as well as our more recent clients joined together for a wonderful evening. Photographs can be viewed on our website.
 
 
Milne Berry   and Berger  have been engaged to assist
and  provide legal advice to Ms  Vivian Solon, who was wrongfully deported by the Australian  Government, even though she was an Australian  citizen.

Working in conjunction with the partner Harry Freedman  is Mr George Newhouse, Deputy Mayor  of Waverly Council, The Honourable       Mr  Justice Marcus Einfeld AO  QC PhD, Mr  Peter Strasser Barrister  and Ms Susie Waters.

Steps are being taken to negotiate a package of assistance to bring Vivian home, and once she has settled back home steps will taken to negotiate a suitable compensation package for her to assist her in rehabilitating herself.

We are in constant negotiations with the Federal  Government and its various offices. We hope to be able to report a successful final conclusion to the matter by the time of our next newsletter.

 
 
 In this issue:
Have you been discriminated?
Getting married? or is it too late?
Can your children enter into contracts?
Real Estate Agents and their duties
Is computer software protected by copyright?
Bringing your loved one to Australia
Dealings with International Persons
Regulator warns on loan scams
 
 Have you been discriminated?
Discrimination   is   when   one   is   treated   unfairly   or harassed i.e.: any form of behaviour that one does  not want, that  intimidates, offends  or  humiliates  one  or identifies one because of ones sex,  age, race, disability, marital status, sexual preference. Discrimination can also involve those who feel they have been prejudiced due to their role as a Carer.

These forms of discrimination are against the law if they happen in relation to employment,  education, access to goods and services, accommodation or registered clubs.

Laws exist in New South Wales and the Commonwealth to protect individuals some of which are;
Anti  Discrimination Act 1977

Disability Services Act 1993

Age  Discrimination Act 2004

Equal  Opportunity   for Women in the Workplace Act 1999

If you  believe  you  have   been harassed  or  victimised   under one  of  the  categories  of D iscrimination, you have the legal right to speak out to try and stop that person or  persons. If the   harassment occurs    at    work, your Employer or Manager must take your   complaint   seriously   and   investigate. If the harassment  occurs  at  school, principals  and  teachers must  address  the  complaints. The  Anti  Discrimination Board  deal with complaints under New South Wales law and   the   Human Rights   and   Equal     Opportunity Commission  handles complaints under Federal  Laws. If you have been a victim or knows someone who has been discriminated and wish to know about your rights, please call us.

 

 
Getting married? or is it too late?
Changes  to the Family  Law Act now allow parties either intending to marry, or already married to come to an agreement  as  to  how  they  would  like  to  divide  their assets in the event that the marriage  breaks down.

These changes have been subject to debate for more than
10 years. Whilst the thought of considering  what is to
happen if your marriage breaks up may not be the most romantic topic to discuss before your wedding, there can be significant practical benefits in considering the issue before   your   marriage. Even   if   you   are   married agreements can now be made between spouses as to the division of property in the event of marriage breakdown.

Financial Agreements  may be entered into before, during or after dissolution of marriage and will be considered to be a  financial agreement if they are made with specific reference to the relevant section of the Family  Law Act and refer to:

(a) how, in the event of the breakdown of the marriage, property or financial resources held  at  the time of the agreement or at a later time are to be dealt with, and
(b) the maintenance of either of the parties during  the marriage, after the marriage or both during or after the dissolution of the marriage.

If you have any questions please call us to discuss.
 

 
 Can your children enter into contracts?
Can  your child enter into a contract and be bound by its terms? For example, can your child enter into a mobile phone contract and be bound by its terms?

It is a common perception that people under the age of 18 cannot be legally bound by contracts or responsible for their actions, but is this correct?

In NSW  the  issue  is  dealt  with  by  the  Minors    (Property  and
Contracts)  Act 1970. Section 17 of the act states that;-

“Unless provided for in this Act, a minor will not be bound by a contract”
However; Section 19 of the Act states that;-

“where a minor participates in a civil act and his/her participation is for his/her benefit, then the contract is presumptively binding on the minor”.
Similar  provisions  apply  regarding  acts  of  negligence. If you have any uncertainty  about  these matters please contact us to discuss, it might save you significant expense and anxiety.

 
 
 Real Estate Agents and their duties
The office of the Fair  Trading recently investigated the issue as to whether Real Estate  Agency LJ Hooker North Ryde had neglected to inform 2 purchasers that their new home was  the scene of 3   brutal murders in the recent past.  Only after the new purchasers had paid the deposit of  $80,000.00 on  their  former  family  home, did  the couple discover that it was the home of the  convicted triple murderer Sef Gonezles.

Subsequent to the purchaser having commenced proceeding at the Office of Fair Trading, LJ Hooker North Ryde, licensee in charge, Peter  Hinton    and sales  person Erica    Hinton,     were   found   to   have   breached   the Properties, Stock and Business Agents Act  and the Fair Trading  Act   for  their  misleading  behaviour   and  for having failed to disclose the homes’ history  when the purchasers expressed their interest in the property.

The decision confirmed that all agents have to disclose all  important  facts  that  would  in  fact  relate  to  the potential impact value of the property.   If the same  are not disclosed to you, the Real Estate  Agent faces the risk of proceedings being commenced against them.

The Office of Fair Trading also confirm that it is currently liaising with the Real Estate Institute of New South Wales on amending the Rules of Conduct  for real estate agents including possible penalty increases and having  codes and  guidelines  on  “Disclosure Requirements”  to   be disclosed to the potential client.

If you have been affected by any non disclosures made by any real estate agents in the past or know someone who have in fact been affected by any similar actions, or dummy bidding or improper sale price  estimates being provided by any real estate agents, please do not hesitate to contact us in order to discuss your issues.
 
 Is computer software protected by copyright?
Please wait till this program loads…beep ..beep..beep

Welcome to the digital world!

Computers  are omnipotent, they are tools which we use in our every day life. But  the question we must ask is, is the software code written by  programmers which make these machines function, protected by the law, namely by copyright. To  be  more  precise  is   the   source  code (programming   statements   before   compilation   of   a program) and object code (compiled  output in machine language) given legal protection. The answer to this lies in   deciphering  the  High Court Case of   Data Access Corporation  v  Powerflex  Services  Pty  Ltd  (1999) HCA 49 (30 Sep 1999).

Data  Access   owned  the  copyright  in  a  system  of programs known as ‘Dataflex’, which had been published in   1981   following   two   years   of   research   and development. The  third   respondent   Dr  Bennett    had familiarized   himself   with   the   Dataflex system   and decided  to  create  an  application  development  system, which   was   compatible   with   the   Dataflex language (PowerFlex). Data Access  claimed that the PowerFlex system had infringed their copyright.

The court based their decision on whether certain words in the source code and object code on their own would  constitute  a  computer program. If it  did, it  would  mean that  the  code  was  a  literary  work and would therefore have copyright protection. Put     simply,     their Honours       concluded  that  their  was no breach because these  words did not   satisfy   the    meaning    of   a computer   program. It should   be noted that this case was based  on single words in the code on its own. A    distinction  is  made   where  the entire code is copied it will be easier to prove that the code is a computer program.     It     should     also     be mentioned  that   the  definition  of computer  program  has  now  been  amended  by  the COPYRIGHT    AMENDMENT    (DIGITAL    AGENDA)  ACT 2000  to mean “a set of statements or instructions to be used directly or indirectly in a computer in order to bring about a certain result.” One can only wait in anticipation to  see  how  the  courts  will  apply  this   definition  to software code.

The case illustrates the ambiguity of protecting computer software  in  the  current  legal  copyright   framework, perhaps a sui genris method should be adopted to afford clearer and better protection for computer programmers so as to ensure that the  digital world will continue to survive  beep…beep…ACCESS   HAS  BEEN   TERMINATED
…GOODBYE!

 
 
 Bringing your loved one to Australia
If your spouse, partner or fiancé lives overseas and you just can’t handle the long distance relationship anymore, we   suggest   you   seek   advice   from   an   Australian Registered Migration Agent    in regard to an  application for her or him to be able to live in Australia  with you permanently.

All  persons applying to migrate to Australia  under the family   stream  (including de-facto   partners) must  be sponsored.  To sponsor your partner you must be either an Australian Citizen, permanent resident or eligible New Zealand citizen. The application, lodged by your partner when either in or outside Australia, is  assessed on an individual basis and will be assessed against Australia’s health and character requirements.

A sponsor is required to provide a written undertaking to the Department of Immigration and Multicultural Affairs, to provide the applicant with support for her or his first two  years  in  Australia, including  accommodation  and financial assistance as required to meet their reasonable living  needs. Australian      Migration   Laws   also   have provisions in regard to sponsoring dependant  children, adopted   children,   parents, carers, aged   dependant relatives, and remaining relatives.

It is important that you seek Migration  Law advice and assistance from only a Registered Migration  Agent.To obtain advice in regard to the above or any other migration law issue, you are able to contact our Registered Migration Agent Victor Berger (RMA 0323406).
 
 Dealings with International Persons
The speed and ease of modern commerce through innovations such as the internet make the regulation and enforcement of such interactions ever more challenging. With websites accessible  in any place connected to the internet, website   hosts   need   to   be   wary   of   the ramifications of their actions in any country in the world and  internet  users   conscious  of  the  difficulties  of pursuing and enforcing their legal rights where web sites are located overseas.

Two  of  the  difficulties  encountered  by  parties  when dealing  with  persons  or  companies  located internationally  are  the  lack  of  amenability  of  such persons to Australian Laws (Personal Jurisdiction) and an inability to enforce your local judgments (Enforcement).

“Personal   jurisdiction”  will  usually  only  be  achieved where the defendant is present in the jurisdiction or has submitted   to   the   jurisdiction. However   Australian Superior Courts  have provisions that provide for  “long arm”  jurisdiction  that  expand  this  concept  in  limited circumstances.

Enforcement  is always difficult with foreign defendants without assets and/or a significant presence in Australia. There  are  means  available  pursuant  to   the  Foreign Judgments   Act  1991  and  certain  treaties  by   which Australian   Judgments  can be enforced against foreign persons located in signatory countries. But the difficulty remains  with  respect  to  Defendants  in  non  signatory countries.

Hence    special care needs to be taken when dealing with foreign  persons. To  limit  the  difficulties  that  may  be encountered  when  enforcing  such  contracts  it  should clearly state the agreed “place of contract” and what law will  apply.  Unfortunately  this  will  not  eliminate  the potential  for  problems  and  hence  it  is  advisable  that advice be sought prior to commencing business dealings with foreign parties.
 
  
 Regulator warns on loan scams
Loan scams are becoming more frequent. The ASIC identified a car loan scam as the top of the “Pie In the Sky” award  for 2005. Some 220 people invested $2.4m after they were told that if they bought  a car through a vehicle buyers’ club and borrowed a little more and invested it offshore the high return would repay their car loan. In the event the returns offshore promised were less than expected. The ASIC said “Scammers frequently use sophisticated props and hard selling techniques that trap even financially experienced people”

The scheme has since been wound up and enquiries are being into a company that was advertising interest-free loans. The advice of the ASIC was: “People  should remember to always deal with licensed Australian  businesses because that way their rights are protected if something goes wrong.”
 
  

LEAP Website | Powered by LEAP Legal Software